"Children are fond of sucking sugar candy
& maids of sausages—larger the better
Shopmen are fond of good sigars & brandy
& I of blunt— & if you change the letter—
To C or K it would quite as handy
& throw the next away—but I'm your debtor
For modesty— yet wishing nought between us
I'd hawl close to a she as vulcan did to venus"
If that wasn't offensive enough, there is an obvious sexualization of the maids shopmen... with the most disturbing sexualization being that of the children "sucking sugar candy." John Clare seems like he's trying to point out that sex is everywhere. Something about the format...the way he presents it, maybe, reminds me of John Wilmot, 2nd Early of Rochester as he was portrayed by Johnny Depp in The Libertine:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfTPS-TFQ_c
It's the wit and the animalistic sexuality mixed with cynicism. It's upsetting, but in an almost entertaining way.
Now that you've pointed it out I can't believe I missed that. The cynic idea of woman and sex makes me furious because I "HATE" how woman in so many books and poems are overly sexual showing a pathetically naive and sexist view of woman, almost a hatred of woman and sexuality by the author. some one told me once the only reason that someone could show so much disgust for something be it woman, sex, or anything was because they were envious or afraid of it. John Clare might have been intimidated by woman and uncomfortable in relationships pertaining to sex and so showed that insecurity by the hatred he spills onto the poem and it's description of woman as vicious, untrustworthy, and overly sexual.
ReplyDelete