Showing posts with label virgins and temptresses. Show all posts
Showing posts with label virgins and temptresses. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

virgins & temptresses


            “…traditional mythology divides woman into two images – the spotless maiden and the degraded whore – separated forever by sexual experience” (Spatz 110)

Women in literature often fall under two categories: the virgin and the temptress. These clichés are utilized by writers to create female characters that further the plot, but fail to do much else in terms of development. The virgin is often utilized as they typical “damsel in distress.” She is innocent, sweet, and often physically weak. The virgin is rewarded with a happy ending. The temptress, however, is determined to bring men down, to cause their fall from grace. She is deceptive, sexualized, and not to be trusted. She is usually punished for her ways. These tropes were not just utilized in fiction, but they furthered social repression of women in real life as well.

Innocence and obedience are seen as some of the most valuable female virtues in the works of this time. The women of “The Castle of Otranto” fulfill these roles; all are subservient to the men and the story. Each of them struggles with the concept of right and wrong, and none of the women receive a happy ending. Hippolita remains under her husband’s power as he tries to divorce her, and values his happiness over her own. Matilda, of course, ends up dead, which is perhaps a consequence of disobeying her father’s rules. Isabella, who seems to be a piece of property, and nothing more than an object of male desire, receives the only variation of a ‘happy’ ending, and even then, she is Theodore’s second choice for marriage.

Adeline, in Radcliffe’s “Romance of the Forest,” is a fairly typical example of the virgin characterization. She incites pity from both LaMotte and the reader, and her first appearance in the novel is when she is rescued after being held captive. Adeline’s characteristics are not those of a well developed character, instead, she is largely a cliché. Physically, she is young, beautiful, and sickly, essentially weak. She is innocent, trusting, and entirely dependent on men. She exists largely as a plot device for the actions and decisions of the male characters; “La Motte makes Adeline into a pawn” is his attempts to escape his own mistakes (Durant 522). Her development is “defined in terms of her evolving relationships with a series of explicitly labeled parental figures” (Durant 520). However, she receives a happy ending, a marriage and enjoyable life.

Christabel, in Coleridge’s “Christabel,” is similarly pure in her description. She dreams of her “betrothed knight,” and prays for his well-being; she is frequently referred to as a sweet, “gentle maid.” Christabel spends much of the poem praying, and is frequently praised for it. The contrast of the temptress appears with Geraldine, who puts on the persona of innocence, but is in reality a much darker character. It can be suggested that Geraldine is a projection of Christabel’s sexuality, “with its desire, fear, shame, and pleasure” (Spatz 111). Geraldine is obviously a more manipulative character. She is described with snake imagery, such as each of her eyes shrinking to a “serpent’s eye” (587). This heavily implies that Geraldine is a creature of evil, representing Satan. Her undressing is a sexualized passage in the play. Clearly, there are supernatural elements at work in Geraldine’s characterization that remain unknown due to the unfinished nature of the poem. The representation of light and dark, and the juxtaposition of purity and sexuality, in these two women are blatant, although their endings are unknown.



Even in William Wordsworth’s The Thorn, there is a version of the temptress. Martha Ray, who gave her “company” with a “maiden’s true good-will,” is abandoned at the altar (10.7-8). Stephen Hill, her lover, weds another maid (which is indicative of virginity). Martha Ray is left pregnant, later her baby dies, and she spends the rest of her years at the infant’s grave, crying “oh misery!” (6.11). Yet again, a woman is punished for sexual “deviancy.”

The blatant sexism in Don Juan provides further commentary on female sexual desire. Clare writes that “a wife is just the prototype to hate,” implying that women within marriage are the beginning, maybe even the source, of hate (299). Female sexuality is threatening to the patriarchy because it “trespasses upon the rights of masculinity to define borders” (Kovesi 191). This explains why the temptress, the one who is more sexually active, is punished in fiction. She is a direct threat to the idea of male control.

Mary Wollstonecraft, by John Opie

In a transition to more feminist literature, Wollstonecraft’s perspective leads us away from these misogynistic, tired tropes. Maria is a character whose history is more complex; she does not fit into either of the categories, and her “punishment” is not a result of her actions, but a result of the patriarchal values and rules. As noted in the presentation on Wollstonecraft, women were imprisoned by the lack of freedoms they were allowed in society. Wollstonecraft herself had a child out of wedlock and was publicly criticized for it, and in her own way of fighting the assumptions made about women, she became the “mother of feminism” through her fictional and non-fictional works.

These clichéd perspectives of women are prevalent throughout Romantic literature, as well as works written before and after that time period. The frequent reduction of women to two contrasting types perpetuates those negative stereotypes, and promotes them not only in fiction, but also in the real world. Even today we have the concepts of “prudes” and “sluts,” each of which define a woman by her sexual behavior, and each of which is a term constructed by the patriarchy as a method of control.


Wednesday, April 10, 2013

(Presentation notes) Women and the Law; Addressing Inequality, Imprisonment and Madness


Women were viewed by society to be the weaker sex, and faced unequal treatment regarding rights by law, job opportunities, and education. Men had the ability to sue their wives for adultery, gain full custody of children in the case of divorce, as well as a full range of educational and legal resources at their disposal. Women on the other hand were unable to sue their husbands (unless attempting to prove physical danger - which was RARELY proven), were seen as the property of their husbands (along with any assets they owned prior), and faced a lack of educational resources and occupational options.

Mary Wollstonecraft is seen by many critics to be the ‘Mother of Feminism’, drawing from many of her own life experiences to form the basis of many of her feminist and ‘radical’ writings. Mary advocated for the rigorous education of young girls into their adulthood, something that was lacking in her time. She also rejected the idea that women were inherently weaker or less capable than men, and strongly fought against the subjugation of women, both in marriage and society. Coming from a family composed of a violent father and a submissive mother, she strove to avoid facing the same ills, but like many others before her- also faced her own demons when it came to her personal life. Pregnant and unmarried (Mary Shelley is the wonderful result of this pregnancy) Mary Wollstonecraft surrounded herself with friends who strongly supported her publications as a means of supporting herself independently, and only later met someone with whom she found herself an equal. 
“The Wrongs of Woman, or Maria”- the asylum setting parallels the lack of physical and mental freedoms that women experienced in society (i.e. the protagonist is imprisoned by her husband unjustly)
“Was not the world a vast prison, and women born slaves?” ( pg. 167)
Mary felt that by denying women serious, rational pursuits, society relegated them to a lifetime of vanity and weakness/inequality. She uses fiction to address feminist ideas of education and morality, medical theories of the mind, and gender differences in a way that is approachable and instructive to the women readership. This novel also helped to pioneer the celebration of female sexuality and cross-class identification between women. 
The heroine’s inability to relinquish her romantic fantasies of life and character reveals women’s collusion in their oppression through false and damaging ‘sentimentalism’. The novel criticizes the patriarchal institution of marriage and the laws that protect it by aligning women with the insane: a minority to be championed in Romantic society. 
This representation reflects a Societal view rather than an Individual view; addressed the wrongs done to women (repression), and by women (sentimentalism).
'Mary Wollstonecraft' by John Opie


 'A Rake's Progress' by William Hogarth (Bedlam depiction)


 'Mary Wollstonecraft' by John Opie


'The Nightmare' by Henry Fuseli

WORKS CITED:
Black, Joseph, ed. The Broadview Anthology of British Literature- The Age of Romanticism. 2nd ed. Vol. 4. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Pr, 2010. Print.
Blake, William. "Drawings for Mary Wollstonecraft's "Original Stories from Real Life"" (c. 1791): Electronic Edition. Library of Congress, n.d. Web. 02 Apr. 2013.
"Mary Wollstonecraft." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 04 July 2013. Web. 04 Apr. 2013.
Wollstonecraft, Mary. Mary, A Fiction and The Wrongs of Woman, or Maria. Ed. Michelle Faubert. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Pr, 2012. Print.

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Negative View of Women in Clare's Don Juan

What I found particularly interesting in John Clare's Don Juan A Poem is the negative view of women throughout the work. In lines 15-16, Clare writes "Wherever mischief is til womans brewing Created from manself--to be mans ruin." Without knowing his past or relationship history, I would guess that he had been heartbroken by a woman or have ill will toward women.
During this time period I know it was common to view women as closer to nature and "hysterical." I also know that women were blamed for the fall of man because Eve ate the apple in the biblical story of how mankind succumbed to sin. I wonder if Clare felt that women were to blame for his misery and thus is "mischief" is about, it is most defintely "womans brewing."(line 16)
This also makes me wonder if Clare viewed woman as wholly more sinful than men, and if so, who does he blame his own sin on? Does he believe that his sin is a result of something that a woman did to him?

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

The Innocent and The Temptress

Cristabel is initially described as a helpless, innocent, girl who needs a man's protection and guidance.  There is no such pretence in Lamia.  She is automatically described as the seductress that even Nymphs and Satyrs cannot resist.  Hermes swears his allegiance to her and is bound to her.  She and Geraldine are in a way sisters.  They both have an unnatural and supernatural command over men. I think Lamia's power is greater than Geraldine's because mythical creatures and Gods are held to a higher standard than a mere mortal. The fact that Lamia can bewitch them so easily is proof of her greater power.

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Lamia and Geraldine: Damsels in Distress

I thought it was interesting while reading the two poems to compare Lamia and Geraldine in terms of their relationships with hero-like figures.  Hermes and Christabel have interactions with Lamia/Geraldine that are similar in some ways.

Lamia is trapped as a serpent (which in Greek culture is pretty low on the animal totem pole), and Hermes removes the illusion.  Through the retelling of her story, Geraldine is 'trapped' as a damsel in distress, but by having Christabel hear her story, the reader realizes that this is an illusion to.  The story is not sound.  "Five warriors" took her, yes...but where are they?  What was a plausible purpose for their leaving, and more importantly, what is her purpose for staying?  There is something Geraldine is not willing to tell Christabel.  Geraldine's flawed story suggests the absence of an important detail, or at the very least, that Geradline is not what she seems (which is reinforced later on with the "bad omens" upon Geraldine's arrival).

There are some other slight differences here.  Hermes only helps Lamia after she helps him by giving him his water nymph.  Geraldine, on the other hand, does not really give Christabel anything of value, except maybe the opportunity to feel like a moral person by helping her.  Whereas Hermes helps Lamia as a reward for her actions, Christabel takes in Geraldine as an act of kindness.

Lamia is portrayed in more of a submissive role.  She immediately wants Lycius and ultimately does not get him; she's punished towards the end of the poem.  It is a male figure that gives her her human form (Hermes) and a male figure that ruins her (Apollonius).  She has a very reactionary existence.

Gerladine is more conniving.  She holds more cards than Christabel (or the reader) is aware of.  Both characters play the part of a damsel in distress, but while Lamia goes along with whatever happens to her, Geraldine seems to have an ulterior motive, something that the reader can only approximate since the poem itself was never completed.

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Mystery & Sanity



"Hence, horrible shadow!
Unreal mockery, hence!" 

These lines are spoken by Macbeth upon seeing Banquo's ghost, an event that symbolizes Macbeth's descent into madness. Lady Macbeth begins to lose trust in her husband and his sanity at this point. Similar, this quote begins a chapter in which many of the characters continue to lose trust in La Motte. His wife still believes that he is having an affair with Adeline, and his private meetings with the Marquis leave the rest of the inhabitants of the abbey uneasy. La Motte's behavior becomes increasingly mysterious throughout the chapter, specifically in his encounters with the Marquis, leaving both Adeline and Madame La Motte worried for his well being. Adeline suffers from "anxiety for the welfare of La Motte" in the same way that Lady Macbeth does during her husband's insane outburst at the banquet. Madame La Motte views "the mysterious conduct of La Motte" with "a pang of self-accusation," and feels guilt similar to Lady Macbeth's guilt over planning the murder of the king. Quoting this specific act from Macbeth makes the reader skeptical of La Motte's sanity and intents as well, and adds to the mystery of the novel. The quote also lends a gothic tone to the chapter by referencing such a well known scene with supernatural elements.

Story of a Girl


Odes of Passion (page 172)

"And Hope enchanted smil’d, and wav’d her golden hair;
And longer had she sung-but with a frown,
Revenge impatient rose…’"

It’s only three lines, three small lines, but those three lines describe so much about that girl, the one girl who is gorgeous beyond simple world but carries on too much in the world. As I read it, that was the pressing thought in my mind. I seem to have a pressing thought for every text that we read (which I suppose is the main point of doing these readings in the first place). It also reminded me of the song “Story of a Girl” because that is the entirety of the song, it is a story of a girl who cried a river and drowned the whole world, but while she looked so sad in photographs, I absolutely loved her, when she smiled (and I digress). Seriously, you all should listen to the song if you haven’t already. That is the song of my childhood.

At first glance, this poem evidently is meant to show something about the female main character Adeline. That seems simple enough, and the ode itself does present that. Standing by itself, I would have just assumed that it was meant for any normal girl because for every girl, and every person for that matter, has been through something that makes them a rose stuck in a bushel of thorns. Put before the chapter however, the “Ode to the Passions” leads the reader into this belief that its placement is obviously of some significance. Similar to a post that I read before, the ode acts as the music before a battle or love scene in a musical or movie before it leads into the actual actions, focusing the audience on that raw emotion to help intertwine them with the story and the characters. It is meant to draw attention to Adeline and her beauty that took Theodore’s heart, which is exactly what the following two paragraphs tell of. It describes the encounters that Theodore had with Adeline and his thoughts on her, how her presence had touched it along with his remembrance of another poem that too describes beauty.

“Oh! Have you seen, bath’d in the morning dew,
The budding rose its infant bloom display;
When first its virgin tints unfold to view,
It shrinks and scarely trusts the blaze of day?

SO soft, so delicate, so sweet she came,
Youth’s damask glow just dawning on her cheek.
I gaz’d, I sigh’d, I caught the tender flame,
Felt the fond pang, and droop’d with passion weak.”

The different poems both resemble each other in that regards, showing painted words of beauty and comparing the girl to a sweet rose. The third paragraph following the second poem though, continues on the second part of the ode, telling why Adeline was “but with a frown, revenge impatient rose” because it is here that Theodore realizes about how Adeline has been hurt, how this entire situation had marred her, leaving her but a delicate rose on the outside and a very impatient, hurt, and scarred by thorns of circumstances. True the second poem serves to amplify Theodore’s initial view on Adeline and her beauty; however, the ode shows us more than her superficial characteristics. It shows us the state of her heart. What stuck out to me even more is that the chapters coordinate with the three lines of the ode, first of her beauty, then of her unrest, and lastly of her brokenness. 

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

The Thorn

Wordsworth's "The Thorn" tells the tragic story of Martha Ray and her troubling life. Represented by the thorn in the poem, she is plagued by heartbreak and the death of her child, which have led to the destruction of her life. Those events "all have joined in one endeavor/to bury this poor Thorn for ever" and as a result, she spends her time upon the hill, crying and lamenting her losses. Her life, once a promising one filled with love, is now one of tragedy and warning to the reader. Her story is mysterious; the narrator is unaware of the circumstances regarding her baby's death. Though she is alive, she has become a sort of ghostly, haunting figure, weeping on the hill for twenty years over the death of her child and the loss of her love. She is unable to escape the tragedy of her past, it is made clear that "the Thorn is bound/with heavy tufts of moss that strive/to drag it to the ground," and she is left to haunt the hill with her misery.

Sunday, January 27, 2013

Women and Power


As SMJ points out, in “The Castle of Otranto” women have a subservient role. Isabella, Matilda, and Hippolita endeavor at all times to do what is right by God and their male authorities. A key component of the plot is that Isabella acts in a manner that seems rebellious to Manfred by running from him. She, though, is serving a higher authority, which is Providence, and protecting her innocence.
All three women find themselves at one point torn between what the male authorities ask of them and what is right. Manfred and Frederic both have moments where their priority is to obtain a young woman, and they use their power to try to do so. It is fitting then that Theodore keeps his passion in check, and although seemingly of lowly status he treats the female characters with the most respect.
Walpole seems to be making a political statement and commenting on those in power following their misguided whims as opposed to what is right. Manfred and Frederic both act on their passions without regard for those involved. Theodore, however, can’t act on his love for Matilda and is not in the place to force her into marriage as Manfred and Frederic have the power to do with whomever they desire. Perhaps Walpole is using the female characters as a vehicle to portray the corruption caused by excessive use of power?

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Small Instances of Atypical Female Behavior


I found that in "The Castle of Otranto", I was really intrigued by the characteristics of the women in the novel. Mostly uniform with the attributes of female characters displayed in literature both prior to and in the 18th century, the women are portrayed mainly as obedient and kept individuals who lack independence in thought, choices, and identity. However, two of the female characters do display moments of uncharacteristic and surprising behavior. Firstly, there is Isabella, who despite her initial role as simply a bargaining tool, becomes the only character to attempt to control her own fate. While her hope to escape is entirely in response to the actions of Manfred, she escapes and saves herself from what would have been a future of compliance and submission. The other main example of defiance of the typical female character is Matilda, in that she releases Theodore from prison, completely and entirely knowingly defying her father. I found it very interesting to see quite strong instances of self aware and defiant behavior in two women from a time of passive, obedient, and disinteresting female literary characters.